The merger of four leading companies in TPL, including ATM, could lead to a better rationalization of the races in the area and savings in administrative organizational field, but certainly not a realistic draft design of racing in the area and the detail of the savings that you believe how to make and will certainly help improve the dialogue and the acceptance of the project. Also close to the speaker's mouth only to political antithesis to those who want to keep a chair on the boards, the usual plethora of those who never want to change the status quo and the many bureaucrats used to brake. Reassure citizens and businesses.
Citizens of Vittorio Veneto wonder about this merger because not have assurance that the settlement of accounts, the transaction will be resolved for Vittorio Veneto in deteriorating service for students and senior citizens while in a further loss of one of the last major bodies that resisted with determination, courage and efficiency, the City Vittorio Veneto is a major political achievement and a feather: is not justifiable in the only loss of ATM, another blow in addition to the range of authorities and functions that already there have been withheld, this time in defiance of a government to citizen of the same sign of the province.
Considering that the company carries out a good public service, is in excellent financial assets, owns from the considerable value of property, it is critical to secure the destiny of public transport Vittoria that, even under the modest but very well sounder economic, equity and organizational ATM compared to many other firms TPL, the possible merger does not reduce the profits of ATM (and therefore the City of Vittorio Veneto) and that the ATM is therefore strongly represented and warranted in the new CDA One company, based on various parameters (reliability, budget and assets, strategic importance) not just the miles. routes and methods.
Try therefore to exhibit a concrete draft design of fusion that expresses also the representativeness of 4 companies in the new CDA One: there is nothing to hide, and maybe it's better now argue that dragging a long and painful dispute, there is no place in public debate in the economic interests of a party, personalistic for positions for political profit, for blackmail or unilateral demands, or for blocks and forcing people from larger companies and pull the rope of the politicians and bureaucrats. We try to ensure that this merger does not become merely a means to gobble up market share, but actually creating a new company in which all 4 players we gain and we lose in equal measure: a gain will be the quality of service and the pockets of citizens and policy credibility.
0 comments:
Post a Comment